People v. ________________, New York County: July 9, 2007
Client was accused of hitting his child by his wife. After a trial, the client was found NOT GUILTY of assault.
People v. ________________, Kings County: May 22, 2007
Client was accused of hitting an elderly man and damaging a garage that the client was renting. After a trial, the client was found NOT GUILTY of assault or criminal mischief.
People v. ________________, New York County: April 11, 2007
Nineteen year-old client was accused of criminal possession of a handgun. RESULT: Case dismissed based on Mr. Fineman's motion for dismissal claiming that the District Attorney's accusations were insufficient as a matter of law.
People v. ________________, New York County: February 13, 2007
Client was accused of Driving While Intoxicated (DWI). The prosecution claimed that the client had an accident with an ambulance while driving drunk. RESULT: On Mr. Fineman's motion for violation of the client's constitutional rights, the case was dismissed, and the client’s driving privileges were fully restored.
People v. ________________, Queens County: September 19, 2006
Client was accused of Criminal Possession of a hand gun, where the police claimed to see a bulge on the client's waist. RESULT: On Mr. Fineman's motion for failure to properly charge the client and for violation of the client's constitutional rights, the case was dismissed.
People v. ________________, New York County: July 27, 2006
Client was accused of Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance (Narcotics) in the 2nd Degree, a class A-II Felony. RESULT: On Mr. Fineman's motion for violation of the client's constitutional rights, the case was dismissed.
People v. ________________, Kings County: July 18, 2006
Client was accused of Robbery where the victim identified him to the police within minutes of the alleged crime. RESULT: After the client testified in the Grand Jury with Mr. Fineman's assistance and preparation, the case was dismissed.
People v. ________________, New York County: May 4, 2006
Client was accused of Criminal Mischief where the District Attorney claimed that the client damaged someone else's car, and it was allegedly caught on video tape. RESULT: As a result of Mr. Fineman's motion, the video evidence was suppressed and the case was dismissed.
If you or a loved one has been arrested, you owe it to yourself to have the right Criminal Defense Attorney. A lot of lawyers claim that they fight to win, but Michael Fineman, Esq. fights to win and gets results. Call right away to schedule a free consultation and Michael Fineman, Esq. is the right lawyer for you.
